It’s been a disappointing week for old-fashioned purists who believe a man is innocent until proven guilty. It’s a simple principle; if, after due process, he is found guilty as charged, any amount of ordure can be poured over his reputation. But if cleared in a proper court, then he leaves the dock “without a stain on his character”, as the judges supposedly say.
This tried and tested practice still applies in a court of law. But in the court of public opinion, in Britain at least, it is no more than a distant memory. As British cabinet minister Chris Huhne and footballer John Terry found to their cost, the very fact of charges being brought against them has already blighted their high-flying careers.
Huhne was forced to resign as environment minister on February 4 to face bizarre charges that he once tried to pass off a driving offence onto someone else. If acquitted, a return to the cabinet is not impossible, the pundits say, but the leadership of his party will never again be a realistic prospect.
Terry was stripped of the captaincy of the England team the same day after being charged with racially abusing another player and there are increasing calls for him to be sacked from the national squad altogether.
Neither man has been found guilty of any offence, or even put on trial yet. Both protest their innocence and vow to fight the charges. But the taint of accusation has rendered them damaged goods. For the sake of the reputation of the government and the England team respectively, their demotion was inevitable.
It was different in the days when newspapermen and their proprietors would hold back the mud-slinging until after a guilty verdict and the general public had no other way of making its own judgements. Today no one can control the bloggers and tweeters, the newspapers are uninhibited, and anyone with a satellite dish can view events on dozens of different tv channels.
Nowadays the principle of innocent-until-proven-guilty takes a back seat to practical considerations. So when handling your media relations in a crisis, forget about whether you are legally, or even morally, innocent or guilty. It really doesn’t matter. What matters is what the general public will think about you. So far as reputation is concerned, it’s not significant that the oil rig was being operated by someone else, or that some supplier’s equipment malfunctioned; if you are the brand name and public opinion is holding you responsible, then you must react accordingly.
So if public opinion overwhelmingly wants you to eat humble pie, appear deeply concerned, or apologise, then try to satisfy its demands – at least as far as you can without compromising your legal position. It may not be fair, but public opinion is not fair.
Oliver Wates, MediaTrain
Posted by MediaTrain
Hitting the Right Notes
November 11, 2011The “Rick Perry Moment” will delight all but supporters of the Republican hopeful from Texas. But it carries a useful lesson for all public speakers.
For anyone who missed it, Governor Perry was on a nationally televised debate with rival candidates and listed the three huge federal government departments he wanted to abolish. “Commerce, Education and …” And there he lost it, the third government agency just wouldn’t come to mind.
For 50 toe-curling seconds he floundered before a live audience of millions. The man who seeks to be president could not recall the scarcely insignificant Department of Energy. Ouch! Many commentators are already reading the last rites over his campaign.
But we should spare a little sympathy for the Texas governor. The bright lights of television and the awareness of the millions behind the camera can do strange things to our brains. The pressures are unimaginable, especially during the hostile environment of a political debate.
How could the debacle have been avoided?
In principle there is nothing wrong with having a list, so long as it is no longer than three. Rhetoric relies heavily on threes, it’s enough to sound weighty and not too many for an audience to absorb. “Commerce, Education and Energy” would have sounded fine.
But as a back-up you need notes, especially in a high-energy (sorry!) situation like Wednesday’s Michigan debate. Don’t prepare pages of notes with carefully crafted sentences. Just one sheet, with the outline plan of what you want to say, in clear script large enough to be read through the glare of the lights.
It should consist of:
– section headings for the points you want to make
– key numbers and names
– any title which might cause difficulty
– a reminder of your prepared soundbites
– and any list.
Turning it into an acronym can be a useful memory-jogger. Governor Perry did briefly peruse his papers in his desperation. But the letters CEE were presumably not there.
Oliver Wates, MediaTrain